Analysis of Options Trading Activities in TSLA, INOD, CAVA Diving Deep into Options Trading: TSLA, INOD, CAVA

Photo of author

By Ronald Tech

Unveiling Notable Friday Option Activity

Delving into the options market today, significant volumes were witnessed in Tesla Inc (TSLA), Innodata Inc (INOD), and CAVA Group Inc (CAVA). These three companies, under the Russell 3000 index, displayed remarkable trading actions that captured the attention of many investors.

High Octane Trading in Tesla Inc (TSLA)

The electric vehicle giant, Tesla Inc, witnessed an impressive surge in options trading volume. A staggering 1.3 million contracts were traded, equivalent to a substantial 131.7 million shares, a figure that overshadows the stock’s average daily volume. Particularly, the $200 strike call option expiring on August 09, 2024, stole the spotlight with 168,056 contracts traded, representing about 16.8 million underlying shares. This surge in trading activities indicates a high level of interest and speculation surrounding the company’s future movements.

Chart showing TSLA's trading history

Options Action in Innodata Inc (INOD)

On the other hand, Innodata Inc showcased a substantial options volume today, with 7,450 contracts traded, representing around 745,000 underlying shares. Notably, the $18 strike put option expiring on August 16, 2024, experienced heightened interest, with 1,252 contracts changing hands, equivalent to approximately 125,200 shares of INOD. This surge suggests a significant focus on potential downside protection or speculation in the market.

Chart illustrating INOD's trading history

CAVA Group Inc (CAVA) Enters the Fray

Lastly, CAVA Group Inc also experienced robust options trading activity, with 22,868 contracts traded, representing around 2.3 million underlying shares. The $91 strike call option expiring on August 09, 2024, stood out with 1,067 contracts traded, equivalent to approximately 106,700 shares of CAVA. This surge in trading indicates a keen interest in the company’s future performance and potential price movements.

See also  Wealth Tax: Debating the Top Tax Bracket Debate Over the Wealth Tax

Are the wealthy getting away with not paying their fair share of taxes, or are they carrying an unfair burden? The debate over the top tax bracket rages on as concerns about income inequality and the concentration of wealth at the top of the economic ladder continue to make headlines. Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have both proposed a wealth tax on the ultra-rich, while even multi-billionaire Warren Buffett has vocally expressed support for the idea, suggesting that it is fair for wealthy Americans to be taxed at a higher rate.

Currently, the top federal income tax rate stands at 37%, applicable to incomes of $539,000 and higher for single taxpayers and $647,850 and higher for couples filing jointly. However, historical data reveals that the top marginal tax rate has been significantly higher in previous eras. In 1944 and 1945, it peaked at a staggering 94%, and in the late 1980s, it hit a low of 28% under former President Ronald Reagan.

Historical Context and Present Day

The taxation of the wealthy has fluctuated significantly throughout U.S. history, demonstrating both higher and lower levels of taxation than the current status. This historical perspective adds complexity to the ongoing debate regarding whether the rich are paying their fair share of taxes. Despite the disputes, recent data from the IRS sheds light on the current tax scenario.

Top 1% Tax Contributions

In 2020, the top 1% of taxpayers—those earning $561,351 or more—contributed a significant 42.3% of the total tax revenue collected. This translates to the top 1% paying more income taxes than the bottom 90% combined. Astonishingly, the top 1% paid a staggering $723 billion in income taxes, while the bottom 90% collectively contributed $450 billion.

State-Level Analysis

Examining the tax burden on the wealthiest individuals at the state level yields interesting findings:

Alabama Minimum income to be considered 1%: $404,560 Average income of the 1%: $1,107,769 Average income tax paid by the 1%: $263,845 Average tax rate of the 1%: 23.82% Alaska Minimum income to be considered 1%: $466,905 Average income of the 1%: $999,772 Average income tax paid by the 1%: $253,754 Average tax rate of the 1%: 25.38% Arizona Minimum income to be considered 1%: $485,146 Average income of the 1%: $1,464,848 Average income tax paid by the 1%: $369,426 Average tax rate of the 1%: 25.22% Arkansas Minimum income to be considered 1%: $387,666 Average income of the 1%: $1,483,925 Average income tax paid by the 1%: $313,266 Average tax rate of the 1%: 21.11% California Minimum income to be considered 1%: $726,188 Average income of the 1%: $2,430,790 Average income tax paid by the 1%: $655,180 Average tax rate of the 1%: 26.95% Colorado Minimum income to be considered 1%: $609,919 Average income of the 1%: $1,799,148 Average income tax paid by the 1%: $465,284 Average tax rate of the 1%: 25.86% Analysis of Minimum Income of the Wealthiest 1% and Average Tax Rates by State Analysis of Minimum Income of the Wealthiest 1% and Average Tax Rates by State

Chart depicting CAVA's trading history

Exploring Options Expirations

For a detailed analysis of the various expiration options available for TSLA, INOD, and CAVA, investors can visit StockOptionsChannel.com. By exploring the diverse range of expirations, investors can strategically position themselves to capitalize on market movements and potential opportunities.

Today’s Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »