Analysis of European Tariffs On China’s EV Makers Unveiling the Impending Consequences of European Tariffs on Chinese Electric Vehicle Manufacturers

Photo of author

By Ronald Tech

Amidst the crossfire of the European Union’s upcoming vote on imposing tariffs on China’s electric vehicle (EV) makers lies a brewing storm. The EU’s intent to shield its own automobile industry from the inundation of competitively priced Chinese EVs sounds the alarm bells for a potential trade war grenade that could detonate in unforeseen ways.

China’s lion’s share of 54% in EV imports to the EU, as reported in 2023, has triggered the EU’s protective instincts. However, a protectionist stand-off with China could birth catastrophic ramifications, jeopardizing EU’s export crusaders, EV ambitions, and the delicate equilibrium of raw material supply lines.

Back in July, the European Commission threw down the gauntlet by slapping provisional tariffs on China’s EVs, sparking tensions despite Beijing’s foreboding warnings of retaliation. Beijing vehemently denies charges of unfair EV company subsidies, attributing its industry supremacy to efficient manufacturing practices.


Source: JATO Dynamics, BNEF, ING Research

The Impasse in Europe-China EV Negotiations

With both camps entrenched in their trade ideologies, the EU and China are at a deadlock in addressing their EV trade disparities.

Trade heavyweights – EU’s Commissioner for Trade, Valdis Dombrovskis, and China’s Minister of Commerce, Wang Wentao – stumbled upon impasse in their futile discussions in September. Dombrovskis called for intensified efforts to unearth a solution palatable to both sides, albeit struggling to bridge the chasm.

Post the October vote, the EC resolved to persist with negotiating with China, a reconciliatory gesture reflecting hopes for a consensus despite wavering member unity on imposing tariffs for the next five years.

Auto Manufacturers Rally Against European Tariffs

The tumultuous waters of impending tariffs elicited sharp resistance from European automotive giants.

Voicing against the imposition of tariffs on Chinese EVs, luminaries from BMW AG and Volkswagen AG forecast a bleak future painted by protectionist doctrines. BMW CEO Oliver Zipse’s strong disapproval captured the essence of a tariff-induced spiral threatening to plunge into isolation from cooperation.

Their fears transcend the rhetoric, with China being a pivotal market hub for BMW, underlining the potential fallout from souring bilateral trade relations.

Former Volkswagen AG CEO Herbert Diess echoed the sentiments, raising the specter of an inflationary surge precipitated by escalating trade tiffs between China and the West.


Source: ITC Trade Map, BNEF, ING Research

Testing the Waters: Provisional European Tariffs on China

The stage was set for a tariff showdown with the EC launching its anti-subsidy investigation directed at China’s EV domain last year.

In a damning indictment, the investigation unravelled China’s web of subsidies benefiting its battery electric vehicle (BEV) value chain, potentiating the economic wounds on EU BEV producers. The highest tariffs landed on Chinese behemoth SAIC Motor at a hefty 36.3%, while BYD and Geely weathered lesser blows at 17.4% and 19.9% respectively.

Seeking middle ground, the EC marginally softened European tariffs toward the twilight of August, factoring in insights and rectifications from EV entities operating in China.

See also  The Rise of Momentum Stocks: September 13th Picks

Navigating the European Tariff Odyssey With China

Provoked by the specter of tariffs, China has raised a challenge against the EU’s compliance with World Trade Organization norms.

The looming confrontation portends an upheaval in the global trade order, calling into question the fickle nature of international relations in an era defined by economic nationalism and competitive jousts.







Euro-China Trade Dispute: Navigating Evolving Relations

Euro-China Trade Dispute: Navigating Evolving Relations

China, in a bold move challenging the EU’s provisional tariffs on electric vehicles, did not mince words. The Chinese Ministry spokesperson’s declaration on August 9 pointedly criticized the EU’s actions as lacking factual and legal foundation. The tension escalated as China swiftly advanced, bringing the EU’s tariffs issue to the WTO’s rules dispute settlement mechanism on August 14.

Not stopping there, China retaliated by initiating an anti-subsidy investigation specifically targeting EU dairy products, including milk, cream, and cheese. In response, the European Commission decided to stand its ground against China’s probe into EU dairy, raising concerns over the validity of the allegations and evidence provided by China.

Europe’s Reliance on China for Raw Materials

Despite the brewing trade storm, Europe finds itself in a precarious position. A full-blown trade war with China could potentially deal a severe blow not only to European companies but also to the broader economy at large. The intricate economic relationship between Europe and China is evident, with China heavily relying on European consumer goods, accounting for 22% of its imports.

This symbiotic relationship is crucial for luxury groups like LVMH and Kering, both of which face potential risks if tensions escalate further. Moreover, as Europe gears towards a future without gasoline and diesel cars by 2035, any European tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles could have repercussions, impacting the cost of EVs for consumers.

Furthermore, Europe’s heavy dependency on China for critical raw materials poses a significant challenge. The EU, in particular, sources 97% of its magnesium and 100% of its rare earths crucial for permanent magnets from China. This reliance underscores the delicate balance in the Euro-China trade dynamic.

China-Europe Trade

“Europe’s path to self-sufficiency in EV production or the EV supply chain appears to be a long and challenging journey,” as highlighted by ING in a statement dated June 19. The need for strategic caution in handling the evolving Euro-China trade relations is imperative to navigate future developments and avoid further escalations.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this article are strictly those of the authors and should not be construed as investment advice. European Capital Insights disclaims any responsibility for financial decisions made based on the information provided in this article. Readers are advised to refer to this article for informational and educational purposes.