Humacyte, Inc. (HUMA) Investors Who Lost Money Have Opportunity to Lead Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Humacyte (NASDAQ:HUMA)

Photo of author

By Ronald Tech

LOS ANGELES, Jan. 13, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz announces that investors with losses related to Humacyte, Inc. (“Humacyte” or the “Company”) HUMA have opportunity to lead the securities fraud class action lawsuit.

IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO SUFFERED A LOSS IN HUMACYTE, INC. (HUMA), CLICK HERE BEFORE JANUARY 17, 2025 (THE LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE) TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ONGOING SECURITIES FRAUD LAWSUIT.

 What Is The Lawsuit About?
The complaint filed alleges that, between May 10, 2024 and October 17, 2024, Defendants failed to disclose to investors: (1) that the Company’s Durham, North Carolina facility failed to comply with good manufacturing practices, including quality assurance and microbial testing; (2) that the FDA’s review of the BLA would be delayed while Humacyte remediated these deficiencies; and (3) that, as a result, there was a substantial risk to FDA approval of ATEV for vascular trauma; and (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

Contact Us To Participate or Learn More:

If you wish to learn more about this action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us.
The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz, 
Email us at: info@frankcruzlaw.com
Call us at: 310-914-5007
Visit our website at: www.frankcruzlaw.com
Follow us for updates on Twitter: twitter.com/FRC_LAW.

If you inquire by email, please include your mailing address, telephone number, and number of shares purchased.

See also  Wealth Tax: Debating the Top Tax Bracket Debate Over the Wealth Tax

Are the wealthy getting away with not paying their fair share of taxes, or are they carrying an unfair burden? The debate over the top tax bracket rages on as concerns about income inequality and the concentration of wealth at the top of the economic ladder continue to make headlines. Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have both proposed a wealth tax on the ultra-rich, while even multi-billionaire Warren Buffett has vocally expressed support for the idea, suggesting that it is fair for wealthy Americans to be taxed at a higher rate.

Currently, the top federal income tax rate stands at 37%, applicable to incomes of $539,000 and higher for single taxpayers and $647,850 and higher for couples filing jointly. However, historical data reveals that the top marginal tax rate has been significantly higher in previous eras. In 1944 and 1945, it peaked at a staggering 94%, and in the late 1980s, it hit a low of 28% under former President Ronald Reagan.

Historical Context and Present Day

The taxation of the wealthy has fluctuated significantly throughout U.S. history, demonstrating both higher and lower levels of taxation than the current status. This historical perspective adds complexity to the ongoing debate regarding whether the rich are paying their fair share of taxes. Despite the disputes, recent data from the IRS sheds light on the current tax scenario.

Top 1% Tax Contributions

In 2020, the top 1% of taxpayers—those earning $561,351 or more—contributed a significant 42.3% of the total tax revenue collected. This translates to the top 1% paying more income taxes than the bottom 90% combined. Astonishingly, the top 1% paid a staggering $723 billion in income taxes, while the bottom 90% collectively contributed $450 billion.

State-Level Analysis

Examining the tax burden on the wealthiest individuals at the state level yields interesting findings:

Alabama Minimum income to be considered 1%: $404,560 Average income of the 1%: $1,107,769 Average income tax paid by the 1%: $263,845 Average tax rate of the 1%: 23.82% Alaska Minimum income to be considered 1%: $466,905 Average income of the 1%: $999,772 Average income tax paid by the 1%: $253,754 Average tax rate of the 1%: 25.38% Arizona Minimum income to be considered 1%: $485,146 Average income of the 1%: $1,464,848 Average income tax paid by the 1%: $369,426 Average tax rate of the 1%: 25.22% Arkansas Minimum income to be considered 1%: $387,666 Average income of the 1%: $1,483,925 Average income tax paid by the 1%: $313,266 Average tax rate of the 1%: 21.11% California Minimum income to be considered 1%: $726,188 Average income of the 1%: $2,430,790 Average income tax paid by the 1%: $655,180 Average tax rate of the 1%: 26.95% Colorado Minimum income to be considered 1%: $609,919 Average income of the 1%: $1,799,148 Average income tax paid by the 1%: $465,284 Average tax rate of the 1%: 25.86% Analysis of Minimum Income of the Wealthiest 1% and Average Tax Rates by State Analysis of Minimum Income of the Wealthiest 1% and Average Tax Rates by State

To be a member of the class action you need not take any action at this time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent member of the class action.  

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

 

Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/humacyte-inc-huma-investors-who-lost-money-have-opportunity-to-lead-securities-fraud-lawsuit-302348862.html

SOURCE The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz, Los Angeles

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs